{"id":41995,"date":"2025-12-05T23:45:54","date_gmt":"2025-12-05T20:45:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/homeland-news.net\/?p=41995"},"modified":"2025-12-05T23:48:22","modified_gmt":"2025-12-05T20:48:22","slug":"a-national-security-strategy-caught-between-america-first-and-a-multilateral-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/homeland-news.net\/?p=41995","title":{"rendered":"A National Security Strategy Caught Between America First and a Multilateral World"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>
A new chapter in American power:<\/strong>\u00a0Trump\u2019s 2025 National Security Strategy revives echoes of Monroe\u2019s 19th-century doctrine while confronting a 21st-century multilateral world that refuses to stand still.<\/figcaption>
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

By Ahmed Fathi<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

American Television News<\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n
\n

“Clear Voices. Global Impact”<\/span>
News & Media Production<\/span><\/span><\/h1>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

UNHQ, New York<\/em><\/strong>: <\/strong>The 2025 National Security Strategy is not a policy document. It is a worldview\u2014sharpened, fortified, and aimed squarely at the post\u2013World War II order the United States once championed. Reading it from inside the United Nations, where multilateralism is oxygen, feels like watching the architect of a house return decades later with a bulldozer and a tape measure, determined to \u201cfix\u201d what everyone else has learned to live in.<\/span><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

The national security strategy\u2019s opening salvo rejects 30 years of American foreign policy as indulgent, misguided, and captured by globalists who outsourced sovereignty to \u201ctransnational institutions.\u201d (p.1\u20132)<\/u><\/a> Let\u2019s call this what it is: a direct ideological attack on the very foundations of cooperative global governance.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

Where the UN sees shared responsibility, the NSS sees dilution of purpose. Where the UN sees interdependence, the NSS sees vulnerability. Where the UN sees diplomacy, the NSS sees interference.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n

This is not a disagreement in tone\u2014it is a rupture in philosophy.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

Migration: The UN\u2019s Humanitarian Pillar Meets America\u2019s New Fortress<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n

The most jarring collision with multilateralism is the document\u2019s absolutist stance on migration. \u201cThe era of mass migration is over,\u201d it declares, placing border control above almost every other national security priority (p.11<\/u><\/a>).<\/u><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

This is the antithesis of the UN\u2019s approach:<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n